Credit Risk

Four considerations for CECL model validation

Four considerations for CECL model validation

Welcome to the CECL time warp. When the FASB announced its CECL requirement in 2016, it seemed like there was an endless amount of time available to meet CECL 2021 implementation deadlines. Now, in 2019, the road to implementation seems like a speedy downhill drive in a car with squeaky brakes – except there are, in fact, ways to check the brakes along the way.

Don’t let your CECL road map turn into a CECL roadblock

Don’t let your CECL road map turn into a CECL roadblock

Jeff Prelle, Head of Risk Modeling at MountainView, a Situs company, served as conference chair at the CECL 2018 Congress Conference.

When it comes to Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) planning, modeling and implementation, the consensus among financial institutions is that there is no consensus, because no two financial institutions are alike. At Situs, we often reinforce the importance of taking a strategic approach to CECL modeling and implementation. After all, CECL’s tentacles touch a wide range of functions within a financial institution, from model and credit risk to accounting and information technology (IT). But when it comes to achieving CECL milestones and tactics, what will work for one bank, credit union or lender may not work for another.